Main field(s) of study and in-depth level:
Peace and Conflict Studies A1N
Explanation of codes
The code indicates the education cycle and in-depth level of the course in relation to other courses within the same main field of study according to the requirements for general degrees:
G1N: has only upper-secondary level entry requirements
G1F: has less than 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
G1E: contains specially designed degree project for Higher Education Diploma
G2F: has at least 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
G2E: has at least 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements, contains degree project for Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Science
GXX: in-depth level of the course cannot be classified.
A1N: has only first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
A1F: has second-cycle course/s as entry requirements
A1E: contains degree project for Master of Arts/Master of Science (60 credits)
A2E: contains degree project for Master of Arts/Master of Science (120 credits)
AXX: in-depth level of the course cannot be classified.
Fail (U), Pass (G), Pass with distinction (VG)
The Department Board
Fulfilment of the requirements for a Bachelor's degree with a social science subject as the main field of study.
After completion of this course the student is expected to be able to:
identify theories and empirical results within a field of research
contrast different theoretical perspectives
critically evaluate research findings and implicit assumptions within a field of research
present and systematically structure a discussion on the theories and empirical results in a way that combines precision with readability
independently delimit, design and write a literature review within the specified time limit
present research findings for various audiences
adhere to the Department's Policy on Ethical Guidelines for Student Work
This course trains you in writing an advanced review of theory and evidence within a specific research field. The review demonstrates to what extent you are able to identify the most important works, trends and debates within a certain field. Such a review is a necessary ingredient in a master thesis but the skills acquired in this course are also useful in many professional activities involving analytical tasks. Summarizing, identifying and delimiting the boundaries of knowledge are key skills when preparing strategic documents, when deriving policy recommendations and when deciding between various policy options.
The course provides you with the opportunity to acquire skills in how to independently assess the state of knowledge within a given field of research. Online supervision sessions and assignments will assist you in identifying and analysing a specific field of research and you are encouraged to select a field closely linked to a future master thesis. Throughout the course you acquire skills in summarizing and presenting theories and results, including being able to identify and to critically scrutinize the basic assumptions within a field of research. In addition, you will develop skills in how to make literature searches using various databases and in how to best present your literature review for various audiences.
Teaching mainly consists of self-studies, online tutoring, and correspondence with the head teacher and other students via the student portal. To participate in the course, you need a computer with a webcam, a headset and access to the Internet. There will be no common course sessions that you need to attend in Uppsala. The course language is English.
The main body of literature for the course consists of the texts - primarily university press books and peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles - identified by the student as constituting the research field under study. In addition, there is some literature that highlight key skills in the craft of review writing and which provide useful examples.
The examination consists of:
A final course memo in the form of a written academic literature review
Acting as a peer-reviewer and discussant on drafts from fellow students
A written policy brief based on the literature review
Active contribution to joint discussions in the online forum
Grades: Pass with Distinction (VG), Pass (G) and Fail (U).
If there are special reasons for doing so, an examiner may make an exception from the method of assessment indicated and allow a student to be assessed by another method. An example of special reasons might be a certificate regarding special pedagogical support from the University's disability coordinator.