Main field(s) of study and in-depth level:
Peace and Conflict Studies A1F
Explanation of codes
The code indicates the education cycle and in-depth level of the course in relation to other courses within the same main field of study according to the requirements for general degrees:
G1N: has only upper-secondary level entry requirements
G1F: has less than 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
G1E: contains specially designed degree project for Higher Education Diploma
G2F: has at least 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
G2E: has at least 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements, contains degree project for Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Science
GXX: in-depth level of the course cannot be classified.
A1N: has only first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
A1F: has second-cycle course/s as entry requirements
A1E: contains degree project for Master of Arts/Master of Science (60 credits)
A2E: contains degree project for Master of Arts/Master of Science (120 credits)
AXX: in-depth level of the course cannot be classified.
Fail (U), Pass (G), Pass with distinction (VG)
The Department Board
A Bachelor's degree, equivalent to a Swedish Kandidatexamen, from an internationally recognised university. Also required is 90 credits in peace and conflict studies, or 90 credits in a related relevant discipline and at least 30 credits in peace and conflict studies or the equivalent. Participation in Methods I.
After completion of this course the student is expected to be able to:
apply the principles of statistical inference
apply and interpret key statistical methods such as linear and logistic regression analysis
independently conduct statistical analysis using statistical software
apply statistical analysis to answer a research question and test theoretical arguments
assess the relevance of using scientific methods outside the academic community, such as in conducting and interpreting policy evaluations and reports
independently solve assignments within allocated time
The course aims to deepen the knowledge of social science methodology that students have acquired during undergraduate studies. The aim is to develop the ability to use the methods of practical research and to sharpen the critical understanding of different methods' advantages and disadvantages. Methods II focuses on the extensive study of many cases and the inferential logic behind statistical analysis. It also involves a practical assignment where statistical analysis is used for a miniature research project which involves all major steps of the research process (e.g. formulating a research question and theoretical argument and operationalizing key concepts).
The course consists of lectures and mandatory seminars. The literature combines generic methods texts with applications from the field of peace and conflict research. Some of the practical exercises used in preparation of the seminars require the use of statistical software.
The course concludes with a written exam. The written exam is intended to provide a basis for grading the students but also offer students an opportunity to repeat the course content and thereby consolidate their knowledge.
Grades: Pass with distinction (VG), Pass (G), Fail (U).
In order to receive the grade Pass (G), the student is required to:
participate in all mandatory seminars and present a genuine attempt to solve all assignments before each seminar. Should a student fail to hand in a seminar assignment on time and/or be absent from a seminar, he/she will need to complete a replacement assignment in addition to the original assignment.
receive a grade of Pass the written exam
In order to receive the grade Pass with distinction (VG), the student is required to:
participate in all mandatory seminars and present a genuine attempt to solve all assignments before each seminar. Should a student fail to hand in a seminar assignment on time and/or be absent from a seminar, he/she will need to complete a replacement assignment in addition to the original assignment
receive a Pass with distinction (VG) on the written exam.
If there are special reasons for doing so, an examiner may make an exception from the method of assessment indicated and allow a student to be assessed by another method. An example of special reasons might be a certificate regarding special pedagogical support from the University's disability coordinator.