Syllabus for Applied Epistemology
Tillämpad epistemologi
Syllabus
- 7.5 credits
- Course code: 5FT182
- Education cycle: Second cycle
-
Main field(s) of study and in-depth level:
Theoretical Philosophy A1N
Explanation of codes
The code indicates the education cycle and in-depth level of the course in relation to other courses within the same main field of study according to the requirements for general degrees:
First cycle
- G1N: has only upper-secondary level entry requirements
- G1F: has less than 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
- G1E: contains specially designed degree project for Higher Education Diploma
- G2F: has at least 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
- G2E: has at least 60 credits in first-cycle course/s as entry requirements, contains degree project for Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Science
- GXX: in-depth level of the course cannot be classified
Second cycle
- A1N: has only first-cycle course/s as entry requirements
- A1F: has second-cycle course/s as entry requirements
- A1E: contains degree project for Master of Arts/Master of Science (60 credits)
- A2E: contains degree project for Master of Arts/Master of Science (120 credits)
- AXX: in-depth level of the course cannot be classified
- Grading system: Fail (U), Pass (G), Pass with distinction (VG)
- Established: 2023-02-27
- Established by: The Department Board
- Applies from: Autumn 2023
-
Entry requirements:
120 credits, or equivalent, including 60 credits in philosophy, aesthetics, musicology, literature or art history. Proficiency in English equivalent to the Swedish upper secondary course English 6.
- Responsible department: Department of Philosophy
Learning outcomes
Upon successful completion of the course, students should:
- be able to apply the central epistemological concepts such as evidence, (internalist, externalist) justification, testimony, and (epistemic and Bayesian) rationality to psychological and social aspects of belief-formation
- have a good grasp of the key psychological and social phenomena discussed in contemporary applied epistemology, such as bias, belief polarization, echo chambers, epistemic injustice, etc.
- be able to describe and evaluate the main positions in contemporary applied epistemology (and epistemologically informed psychology) in relation to the above phenomena.
Content
In this course, we will discuss one of the principal ways in which the conceptual tools from contemporary epistemology can be applied to real-world situations. We will, namely, be discussing beliefs that have a significant impact on our social and political lives. These beliefs are formed by selectively gathering and evaluating evidence, influenced by our pre-existing beliefs and cultural identities. The stock examples of such sets of beliefs are climate skepticism and vaccine hesitancy. It is plausible, however, that each of us holds many beliefs formed in a biased and/or prejudiced manner that can result in attitude polarization, our gathering in echo chambers, and epistemic injustice. We will ask how these beliefs should be evaluated from an epistemological point of view. For example, is it the case that the biased or prejudiced believers fail to meet their epistemic obligations (e.g. to respect their evidence)? Is it that they have succumbed to epistemic vice? Are the polarized beliefs or the beliefs of the inhabitants of echo chambers irrational or unjustified? And if not, should we be looking for what's wrong with such beliefs on a societal and structural level (laying no blame on individuals)? The course will offer an overview of the present vigorous debates on the above questions. We will finish by discussing the options for improving the (supposedly) problematic beliefs and believers (both at the individual and social levels).
Instruction
Instruction will be provided by means of seminars and lectures.
Assessment
Class participation and a 3500-word essay at the end of the course on a topic approved by the teacher.
If there are special reasons for doing so, an examiner may make an exception from the method of assessment indicated and allow a student to be assessed by another method. An example of special reasons might be a certificate regarding special pedagogical support from the University's disability coordinator.
Other directives
The course may run jointly with the first cycle course 5FT183.
The course may also run jointly with a PhD course. The assessment of PhD students is based upon class participation and a 4500-word essay at the end of the course on a topic approved by the teacher.
Reading list
Reading list
Applies from: Autumn 2023
Some titles may be available electronically through the University library.
Reading List
Information on course readings is announced here or in Studium at the latest five weeks before the start of the course.
-
Stanovich, Keith E.
The bias that divides us : the science and politics of myside thinking
Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, [2021]
Reading list revisions
- Latest reading list (applies from Autumn 2023, version 2)
- Previous reading list (applies from Autumn 2023, version 1)