Resolving Jihadist Conflicts?
One of the most pressing challenges on the contemporary agenda for peace and security is armed conflicts involving militant groups with self-proclaimed Islamist aspirations, such as IS (Islamic State) in Syria and Iraq, Boko Haram in Nigeria and the Taliban in Afghanistan. However, we know surprisingly little about the conditions under which jihadist conflicts, partly or completely, may be resolved through peaceful means. In particular, there is a gap in peace and conflict research concerning if, how, and to what extent, our existing theories on conflict resolution are applicable to solve jihadist conflicts. The research project “Resolving Jihadist Conflicts? Religion, Civil War, and Prospects for Peace” sets out to fill this lacuna. The purpose is to explore the potential, as well as the limitations, for conflict resolution in these contexts by examining the research question: under what conditions are jihadist conflicts likely to be resolved?
On 27 March 2014, the government of the Philippines and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) signed the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro to mark the end of four decades of armed conflict. The MILF fought to establish an independent Islamic state in Mindanao of the southern Philippines. Image from Evening Standard.
About the project
Read more about "Resolving Jihadist Conflicts? Religion, Civil War, and Prospects for Peace”.
Core Group
The Core Group members all bring specific knowledge and expertise to the project. Read more.
Advisory Board
The project benefits from the guidance of an Advisory Board of esteemed international scholars.
Project participants and collaborative networks
The project also benefits from the active participation of a carefully selected Working Group.