Stefan Eriksson
Senior Lecturer/Associate Professor at Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences; Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB)
- Telephone:
- +46 18 471 61 98
- Mobile phone:
- +46 73 469 76 26
- E-mail:
- stefan.eriksson@crb.uu.se
- Visiting address:
- BMC, Box 564, Husargatan 3, Uppsala
- Postal address:
- Box 564
751 22 UPPSALA
Advisor at University Board and Chief Officers; Advisers to the Vice-Chancellor
- Mobile phone:
- +46 73 469 76 26
More information is available to staff who log in.
Short presentation
Stefan Eriksson works with research ethics at Uppsala University. Special interests include how science should be regulated, informed consent and autonomy, as well as research integrity and publication ethics.
Publications
Recent publications
- YouTube as a source of information on clinical trials for paediatric cancer (2023)
- How do journals publishing palliative and end‐of‐life care research report ethical approval and informed consent? (2023)
- Individual moral responsibility for antibiotic resistance (2022)
- Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences (2022)
- Predatory conferences (2022)
All publications
Articles
- YouTube as a source of information on clinical trials for paediatric cancer (2023)
- How do journals publishing palliative and end‐of‐life care research report ethical approval and informed consent? (2023)
- Individual moral responsibility for antibiotic resistance (2022)
- Perceptions on the prevalence and impact of predatory academic journals and conferences (2022)
- Predatory conferences (2022)
- An Effort Worth Making (2021)
- Why unethical papers should be retracted (2021)
- Predatory nursing journals (2021)
- Preferences regarding antibiotic treatment and the role of antibiotic resistance (2020)
- Reporting the details of consent procedures in clinical trials (2020)
- Are cancer patients better off if they participate in clinical trials? (2020)
- The culture of hope and ethical challenges in clinical trials (2020)
- Research ethics revised (2019)
- Low risk pragmatic trials do not always require participants' informed consent (2019)
- Selektiv rapportering av kliniska prövningar (2019)
- Should the deceased be listed as authors? (2019)
- Authorship Order (2019)
- Public awareness and individual responsibility needed for judicious use of antibiotics (2018)
- How to counter undeserving authorship (2018)
- Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’ (2018)
- Quality of online information about phase I clinical cancer trials in Sweden, Denmark and Norway (2018)
- When Nursing Care and Clinical Trials Coincide (2018)
- Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers (2018)
- Revise the ICMJE Recommendations regarding authorship responsibility! (2018)
- Representation of Ethnic Minorities in Swedish Clinical Cancer Trials: A Qualitative Study of Physicians' Experiences (2018)
- Uncritical and unbalanced coverage of synthetic biology in the Nordic press (2017)
- What should we do about predatory publishing? (2017)
- Hantering av oredlighet i forskning: Kan förväntningar på en ny modell uppfyllas? (2017)
- The false academy (2017)
- Autonomy is a Right, Not a Feat (2016)
- Forskningsetikens nya huvudfråga – den falska akademin? (2015)
- Ge doktorander en starkare ställning (2015)
- Plagiarism in research (2015)
- Conceptions of decision-making capacity in psychiatry (2015)
- Ethical deliberations about involuntary treatment (2015)
- Viktigt rättsfall om forskares användning av studentarbeten (2014)
- Making researchers moral (2014)
- Why participating in (certain) scientific research is a moral duty (2014)
- Etiska aspekter att tänka på i observationsstudier (2013)
- Adequate trust avails, mistaken trust matters (2013)
- The ethics of disseminating dual use knowledge (2013)
- Paternalism in the Name of Autonomy (2013)
- Autonomy-based arguments against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia (2013)
- How can the ethics of dementia research be ensured? (2012)
- On the need for improved protections of incapacitated and non-benefitting research subjects (2012)
- Moral obligations for synthetic biology research (2012)
- Ethical competence in dual use life science research (2012)
- Biobank Research and Consent (2011)
- Does Informed Consent Have an Expiry Date? (2011)
- The moral primacy of the human being (2011)
- Four Themes in Recent Swedish Bioethics Debates (2011)
- A precautionary principle for dual use research in the life sciences (2011)
- Presumed consent and taking organs from the unwilling (2011)
- The Risks and Benefits of Re-Consent (2011)
- Biobank research (2011)
- What a strange subject bioethics is (2010)
- The role of guidelines in ethical competence-building (2010)
- Ethical Dilemmas and Ethical Competence in the Daily Work of Research Nurses (2010)
- Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research (2010)
- Changing defaults in biobank research could save lives too (2010)
- You can use my name; you don't have to steal my story (2010)
- Changing perspectives in biobank research (2009)
- Do Ethical Guidelines Give Guidance? (2008)
- Against the principle that the individual shall have priority over science (2008)
- Patients' refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks (2008)
- Opt-out from biobanks better respects patients' autonomy (2008)
- Taking due care (2008)
- Being, Doing, and Knowing (2007)
- Limited Relevance of the Right Not to Know (2007)
- Concern, pressure and lack of knowledge affect choice of not wanting to know high-risk status (2007)
- Etik på jobbet: Kommentarer till riktlinje 6 (2006)
- Etik på jobbet: Kommentarer till riktlinje 5 (2006)
- Etik på jobbet: Kommentarer till riktlinje 4 (2006)
- Etik på jobbet: Kommentarer till riktlinje 3 (2006)
- Ja, vi behöver ett nytt system, men nej, vi behöver inte en nationell särlösning. (2006)
- Provide expertise or facilitate ethical reflection? A comment on the debate between Cowley and Crosthwaite (2006)
- Etik på jobbet: kommentarer till riktlinje 2 (2005)
- Etik på jobbet: Kommentarer till riktlinje 1 (2005)
- Keep people informed or leave them alone? (2005)
- Potential harms, anonymization, and the right to withdraw consent to biobank research (2005)
- Should results from genetic research be returned to research subjects and their biological relatives? (2004)
- Måtta med förnyat samtycke när prov används för nytt ändamål (2003)
- When Character is More Important than Intelligence (2003)
- Jesu barmhärtighet går på tvärs mot världens sätt att tänka (2003)
- Refining the Distinction between Modern and Postmodern Theologies (2002)
- Recension av D.Z. Phillips, Filosofi – en presentation (2002)
- Den moraliska fantasin förenar etik och estetik (2002)
- Samtal måste föras! (2002)
- The Resurrection and the Incarnation (2001)
- Genetisk kunskap gör oss friare än någonsin (2001)
- Fångade i samma nät? (2001)
- Religionsfilosofer om teodicéproblemet (2001)
- Autonomi och religion - Jehovas vittnen och blodtransfusioner (2001)
- Webbplats om forskningsetik för forskare, studenter och patienter (2001)
- Gud - synlig eller osynlig? (2001)
- Gen-etikens århundrade (2000)
- Jesu uppståndelse som filosofiskt problem - svar till Johan Modée (1999)
- Kontroversiellt om forskningsetik (1999)
- Tro och Religion (1999)
- Jesu uppståndelse som filosofiskt problem (1998)
- Kan Gud liknas vid en färg? (1997)
- Recension: Tillit, verklighet och värde av Tage Kurtén (1996)
- Medlemskap och kyrkans identitet (1996)
- Bär bud om en rörelse som söker Gud (1996)
- Recension: The Limits of Experience; av Lars Hertzberg (1996)
- Recension av M Westphal: Suspicion & Faith; D A Hart: Faith in Doubt; H Arts: Faith and Unbelief (1995)
- Recension av Is God Real? / J. Runzo (red) (1994)
- Linder, det är lättare att granska andras åskådning än sin egen (1994)
- Bergstedts kristendom är illa ute (1994)
- Challenging the rationality of research regulation
Books
- Publiceringsetik (2013)
- Makt och religion i könsskilda världar (2003)
- Ett mönster i livets väv (1998)
Chapters
- Synthetic Biology in the Press (2016)
- Civil Society Participation in the Management of the Common Good (2014)
- Vad kan vi lära av moraliska dilemman? (2008)
- Mapping the Debate on Informed Consent (2003)
- Informed consent and biobanks (2001)
- Autonomi och förståelsens komplexitet (2001)
- Fanatism och tvivel (1998)
Reports
Other
