Ethics in Research, Writing and Communication
Syllabus, Master's level, 3FV385
- Code
- 3FV385
- Education cycle
- Second cycle
- Grading system
- Fail (U), Pass (G)
- Finalised by
- The Educational Board of Medicine, 6 September 2021
- Responsible department
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences
Entry requirements
180 credits
Learning outcomes
After completing the course, the student is expected to be able to:
Knowledge and understanding
- Describe the history of the research ethics, central research ethics concepts and current national and international research ethics rules and guidelines
- Describe the distinctive features, genres, and function of academic texts
Skills and abilities
- Independently analyze and critically reason about different research ethical dilemmas and problems that may arise in different phases of the research process and relate this reasoning to his/her own research
- Reflect on norms and conventions that govern academic writing and communication with the society
- Show the application of an ethical approach in his/her own text production
Judgement and approach
- Critically reflect on ethical ways of writing and communicating research to society
Content
Within the framework of the course ethical theories, guidelines and laws governing research, good research practice, scientific misconduct, ethics in the academic writing as well as the ethics of science communication.
Instruction
The course is web-based and consists of modules that students go through independently, as well as web-based seminars. Active participation in all seminars is mandatory. Absence from any of these will need to be compensated.
To be able to participate in web-based modules and teaching via Zoom, a computer / tablet / smartphone with internet connection as well as a headset and webcam are required.
Assessment
Assessment will be based on active participation in seminars, submitted written assignments, and online self-correcting quizzes. In addition, an individual final assignment will be written and orally presented in a group.
If there are special reasons for doing so, an examiner may make an exception from the method of assessment indicated and allow a student to be assessed by another method. An example of special reasons might be a certificate regarding special pedagogical support from the University's disability coordinator.
Reading list
No reading list found.