.NET development
Syllabus, Bachelor's level, 2IS225
- Code
- 2IS225
- Education cycle
- First cycle
- Main field(s) of study and in-depth level
- Software Engineering G1F
- Grading system
- Fail (U), Pass (G), Pass with distinction (VG)
- Finalised by
- The Department Board, 25 October 2018
- Responsible department
- Department of Informatics and Media
General provisions
The course is included in the following degree programme:
* Bachelor's programme in Information Systems, specialisation software engineering, 180 credits.
Is also given as a freestanding course
Entry requirements
30 credits in software engineering or the equivalent
Learning outcomes
Regarding knowledge and understanding the student is expected to be able to on completion of the course:
* describe possibilities that .NET framework provides for development of web applications,
* account for language mechanisms in C#,
* describe the principles of Object Relational Mapping (ORM).
Regarding competence and skills the student is expected to be able to on completion of the course:
* develop and configure web applications with ASP.NET with separated layers for presentation, business logic and database,
* use the security model in ASP.NET for authentication and authorization,
* design applications with data access via LINQ.
Regarding judgement and approach the student is expected to be able to on completion of the course:
* evaluate the suitability of solutions in view of maintenance and performance.
Content
The course covers the language C # and its specific language constructions as well as central parts of the .NET framework. The course includes the development of a web application using .NET framework, which also includes aspects of data management with ORM and security configuration. The development of a web application includes problem solving as well as documenting the solution in writing and describing its qualities.
Instruction
Teaching is given as lectures and laboratory.
Assessment
The course is examined through written examination, written assignments and oral presentations.
If there are special reasons for doing so, an examiner may make an exception from the method of assessment indicated and allow a student to be assessed by another method. An example of special reasons might be a certificate regarding special pedagogical support from the University's disability coordinator or a decision by the department's working group for study matters.