Consultation checklist before licentiate application

1

The entire licentiate application is presented during the consultation.

3

At least two proposed examining committee members are docents (associate professors) or have equivalent expertise.

4

If more than one selected examining committee member is not a docent, their CV’s are attached.

5

Only one member is from the home department*.

6

There has been co-publication between a supervisor and an examining committee member in the last 5 years.

7

There has been co-publication between a supervisor and the reviewer in the last 5 years.

8

There is a supervisor-doctoral student relationship between a supervisor and an examining committee member.

9

There is/has been considerable collaboration between a supervisor and an examining committee member.

10

The doctoral student has written a summary of the thesis with a list of included papers, including the publication status of each paper.

11

The principal supervisor has written a statement on the doctoral student's contribution and the novelty of the thesis.

12

The report card is completed, signed by all supervisors and relevant heads of department and attached.

13

Register extracts from Ladok are available.

14

The doctoral student is the primary author or joint primary author of a sufficient number of papers (half or more than half).

15

The scope and content of the thesis seems, in general, to be sufficient: number of sections, type of sections, choice of subject, etc.

16

There is an account of how many times each paper has been or will be used in another thesis: the name of the doctoral student, the title/provisional title of the thesis.