Programme reviews at the Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy
Based on Uppsala University’s overall model, the Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy has developed a detailed description of forms and procedures for quality assurance, quality development and evaluation, as well as a timetable.
Completed programme reviews (in Swedish)
- Bachelor of Science Programme in Pharmacy zip, 1 MB.
- Biomedical Laboratory Science Programme zip, 637 kB.
- Doctoral studies in medicine and pharmacy zip, 5 MB.
- Freestanding courses and contract education zip, 3 MB.
- Master of Science Programme in Pharmacy zip, 1 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Clinical Pharmacy
zip, 965 kB. - Master’s Programme in Biomedicine zip, 4 MB.
- Master’s programmes in Pharmaceutical Modelling and Drug Discovery and Development zip, 3 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Public Health zip, 2 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Forensic Science zip, 3 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Global Health zip, 3 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Infection Biology zip, 7 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Medical Research zip, 10 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Medical Nuclide Techniques zip, 5 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Molecular Medicine zip, 4 MB.
- Midwifery Programme zip, 886 kB.
- Physiotherapy Programme zip, 1 MB.
- Radiography Programme zip, 1 MB.
- Speech and Language Pathology Programme zip, 867 kB.
- Supplementary education for pharmacists with a foreign degree zip, 2 MB.
- Supplementary education for biomedical scientists with a foreign degree zip, 2 MB.
Template for annual follow-ups
When to submit documents
Submissions are due at different times of the year depending on whether the programme is evaluated on a calendar year basis (e.g. 2020) or an academic year basis (e.g. 2020/2021).
The officer responsible for each programme under evaluation ensures the submission of the documents and creates a file for decision in the following committees.
Programmes evaluated on a calendar year basis
- A proposal for the plan, reviewers and student representatives is submitted to the GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF, who approve (December).
- The proposal is first sent to the AU, which prepares it, and then to the ON for a decision (January).
- The statement, reports and planned actions are sent to the GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF (November).
- The GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF review, comment and approve (November).
- The statement, reports and planned actions are sent first to the AU, which prepares, and then to the ON (December).
- The ON decides on necessary actions or follow-up and approves (December).
- The statement, reports and planned measures are sent to the Division for Quality Enhancement and the Registrar (January).
- The statement and planned measures are published on Uppsala University’s website (January).
Programmes evaluated on an educational year basis
- A proposal for a plan, reviewers and student representatives is submitted to the GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF, who approve (May).
- The proposal is first sent to the AU, which prepares it, and then to the ON for a decision (June).
- The statement, reports and planned actions are sent to the GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF (May).
- The GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF review, comment and approve (May).
- The statement, reports and planned actions are sent first to the AU, which prepares, and then to the ON (June).
- The ON decides on necessary actions or follow-up and approves (June).
- The statement, reports and planned measures are sent to the Division for Quality Enhancement and the Registrar (August).
- The statement and planned measures are published on Uppsala University’s website (August).
