Programme reviews at the Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy
Based on Uppsala University’s overall model, the Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy has developed a detailed description of forms and procedures for quality assurance, quality development and evaluation, as well as a timetable.
Completed programme reviews (in Swedish)
- Bachelor of Science Programme in Pharmacy Zip, 926 kB.
- Biomedical Laboratory Science Programme Zip, 637 kB.
- Doctoral studies in medicine and pharmacy Zip, 5 MB.
- Freestanding courses and contract education Zip, 3 MB.
- Master of Science Programme in Pharmacy Zip, 1 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Clinical Pharmacy
Zip, 1 MB. - Master’s Programme in Biomedicine Zip, 4 MB.
- Master’s programmes in Pharmaceutical Modelling and Drug Discovery and Development Zip, 3 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Public Health Zip, 2 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Forensic Science Zip, 3 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Global Health Zip, 3 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Infection Biology Zip, 7 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Medical Research Zip, 10 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Medical Nuclide Techniques Zip, 5 MB.
- Master’s Programme in Molecular Medicine Zip, 4 MB.
- Midwifery Programme Zip, 886 kB.
- Physiotherapy Programme Zip, 703 kB.
- Radiography Programme Zip, 1 MB.
- Speech and Language Pathology Programme Zip, 867 kB.
- Supplementary education for pharmacists with a foreign degree Zip, 2 MB.
- Supplementary education for biomedical scientists with a foreign degree Zip, 2 MB.
Template for annual follow-ups
When to submit documents
Submissions are due at different times of the year depending on whether the programme is evaluated on a calendar year basis (e.g. 2020) or an academic year basis (e.g. 2020/2021).
The officer responsible for each programme under evaluation ensures the submission of the documents and creates a file for decision in the following committees.
Programmes evaluated on a calendar year basis
- A proposal for the plan, reviewers and student representatives is submitted to the GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF, who approve (December).
- The proposal is first sent to the AU, which prepares it, and then to the ON for a decision (January).
- The statement, reports and planned actions are sent to the GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF (November).
- The GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF review, comment and approve (November).
- The statement, reports and planned actions are sent first to the AU, which prepares, and then to the ON (December).
- The ON decides on necessary actions or follow-up and approves (December).
- The statement, reports and planned measures are sent to the Division for Quality Enhancement and the Registrar (January).
- The statement and planned measures are published on Uppsala University’s website (January).
Programmes evaluated on an educational year basis
- A proposal for a plan, reviewers and student representatives is submitted to the GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF, who approve (May).
- The proposal is first sent to the AU, which prepares it, and then to the ON for a decision (June).
- The statement, reports and planned actions are sent to the GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF (May).
- The GRUFF, GRUNK and KUF review, comment and approve (May).
- The statement, reports and planned actions are sent first to the AU, which prepares, and then to the ON (June).
- The ON decides on necessary actions or follow-up and approves (June).
- The statement, reports and planned measures are sent to the Division for Quality Enhancement and the Registrar (August).
- The statement and planned measures are published on Uppsala University’s website (August).
