Competition growing in THE’s world rankings

Uppsala universitetet presterar något bättre inom indikatorerna som fokuserar på forskning. Foto: Mikael Wallerstedt, Uppsala universitet
Uppsala University has fallen five places to 133rd place in the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings. This downward trend is also evident at other Swedish higher education institutions, whilst Asian universities are advancing.
Other Swedish higher education institutions on the list are also losing ground on the Times Higher Education (THE) World University Rankings 2027. The same trend can be seen in most other European countries and in the United States. Generally speaking, it is universities in Asia that are moving up the rankings; however, the top ten still includes seven institutions from the United States and three from the United Kingdom.
“Chinese higher education institutions are performing well across several indicators, but they are facing challenges in indicators that measure internationalisation, which means they have not yet made it into the top ten,” says Emma Östlund, a controller in the Planning Division at Uppsala University.
At the top of the list is the University of Oxford, followed by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, with Princeton University and Stanford University tied for third place.
Fourth place in the country
The top Swedish higher education institution is Karolinska Institutet (KI) in 55th place (two places lower than last year), followed by Lund University in 104th place (nine places lower than last year) and KTH Royal Institute of Technology in 106th place (eight places lower than last year). Uppsala University takes fourth place in the country in 133rd place.
The Times Higher Education rankings use five main indicators and 18 subsidiary indicators.
“Uppsala University is performing slightly better in the indicators that focus on research and measure the number of articles, income, reputation and various citation metrics,” says Östlund.
However, the University scores slightly lower in other indicators, which include various measures of collaboration with industry and internationalisation. Even so, there have been no significant or alarming changes compared with last year’s ranking.
Annica Hulth